Top Four Models of Curriculum Designs by Authors

Curriculum design is the process of planning, developing, and implementing educational programs that effectively meet the needs of learners. A well-designed curriculum helps students to achieve their academic goals and enhances their overall learning experience. Over the years, several models of curriculum design have been developed, each with its unique features, strengths, and weaknesses. In this article, we will explore four of these models: the Tyler model, the Taba model, the Wheeler model, and the Kerr model. We will examine the fundamental principles, key features, and applications of each model to gain a deeper understanding of curriculum design.

The Tyler Model

The Tyler model of curriculum design is named after Ralph Tyler, who is widely regarded as the father of educational evaluation. Tyler proposed a systematic approach to curriculum design based on four fundamental questions: What are the objectives of the program? What learning experiences will help students achieve these objectives? How can we organize these learning experiences effectively? How can we evaluate the effectiveness of the program? The Tyler model emphasizes the importance of clearly defined objectives and measurable outcomes as the basis for curriculum design. The model also emphasizes the need for alignment between the objectives, content, and evaluation methods of the program.

The Taba Model

The Taba model of curriculum design was developed by Hilda Taba, an Estonian-American educator and curriculum theorist. Taba’s model emphasizes a collaborative and participatory approach to curriculum design, in which teachers, students, and other stakeholders work together to develop a shared understanding of the curriculum. Taba’s model is based on a cyclical process of curriculum development, which involves four stages: diagnosis, formulation of objectives, selection of content and learning experiences, and evaluation. The Taba model emphasizes the importance of contextual factors, such as the cultural background, learning styles, and interests of the students, in shaping the curriculum.

The Wheeler Model

The Wheeler model of curriculum design was developed by David Wheeler, a British educator and philosopher. Wheeler’s model emphasizes the importance of a flexible and responsive approach to curriculum design, which can adapt to changing social, economic, and technological contexts. The Wheeler model is based on a cyclic process of curriculum development, which involves five stages: analysis of the context, formulation of aims and objectives, selection of content and learning experiences, organization of learning activities, and evaluation. The Wheeler model emphasizes the need for ongoing evaluation and revision of the curriculum in response to feedback from stakeholders.

The Kerr Model

The Kerr model of curriculum design was developed by Donald Kerr, an American educator and curriculum theorist. Kerr’s model emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to curriculum design, which takes into account the social, cultural, and ethical dimensions of education. The Kerr model is based on a cyclic process of curriculum development, which involves six stages: social analysis, educational purposes, curriculum objectives, selection of content and learning experiences, organization of learning activities, and evaluation. The Kerr model emphasizes the need for a broad and balanced curriculum that addresses the intellectual, emotional, and social needs of students.

Comparison of the Four Models

The four models of curriculum design discussed above differ in their underlying principles, focus, and applications. The Tyler model emphasizes the importance of clearly defined objectives and measurable outcomes as the basis for curriculum design, while the Taba model emphasizes the need for a participatory and collaborative approach to curriculum design. The Wheeler model emphasizes the importance of a flexible and responsive approach to curriculum design, while the Kerr model emphasizes the need for a holistic and socially responsive approach.

Despite these differences, all four models share some common features. For example, they all emphasize the importance of identifying the needs and interests of learners and using this information to guide curriculum development. They also all involve a cyclic process of curriculum development that involves stages of analysis, formulation of objectives, selection of content and learning experiences, organization of learning activities, and evaluation.

However, each model also has its unique strengths and weaknesses. The Tyler model is highly systematic and logical, but it can be overly prescriptive and may not account for contextual factors that influence the effectiveness of the curriculum. The Taba model is highly participatory and flexible, but it may lack clarity and may be challenging to implement in practice. The Wheeler model is highly responsive and adaptable, but it may not provide a clear framework for curriculum development. The Kerr model is highly holistic and socially responsive, but it may lack specificity and may not adequately address the cognitive and intellectual needs of learners.

Implications for Curriculum Design

The four models of curriculum design offer valuable insights into the curriculum development process and can guide educators in designing effective and engaging educational programs. By combining the strengths of each model and addressing their weaknesses, educators can develop a comprehensive and tailored approach to curriculum design that meets the needs of their learners.

To apply these models effectively, educators should consider the following factors:

• Understanding the needs and interests of learners: Curriculum development should start with a clear understanding of the needs, interests, and backgrounds of the learners. This information can help educators design a curriculum that is engaging, relevant, and meaningful to students.
• Defining clear and measurable objectives: Objectives should be clear, specific, and measurable to guide the selection of content and learning experiences. This ensures that the curriculum is focused and aligned with the intended outcomes.
• Incorporating contextual factors: Contextual factors, such as cultural background, learning styles, and interests, should be taken into account in curriculum design to ensure that the curriculum is relevant and meaningful to learners.
• Using a cyclic approach: Curriculum development should be viewed as a cyclic process that involves continuous evaluation and revision based on feedback from stakeholders.
• Balancing rigor and relevance: Curriculum design should balance rigor and relevance to ensure that the curriculum is challenging but also meaningful and engaging to learners.

Conclusion

Curriculum design is a complex process that requires careful planning, development, and implementation to meet the needs of learners. The four models of curriculum design discussed in this article offer valuable insights into the curriculum development process and can guide educators in developing effective and engaging educational programs. By combining the strengths of each model and addressing their weaknesses, educators can develop a comprehensive and tailored approach to curriculum design that meets the needs of their learners.